In “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial
Discourses”, written by Chandra Talpade Mohanty, Mohanty first states how she
feels colonization has become a term too widely used, one which is used to
characterize every struggle faced by the third world women. “The definition of colonization I invoke is a
predominantly discursive one, focusing on a certain mode of appropriation and codification of 'scholarship' and
'knowledge' about women in the third
world by particular analytic categories
employed in writings on the subject which take as their primary point of
reference feminist interests as they have been articulated in the US and western Europe” (page 2). She then
continues on to introduce the term “third world woman” and how it has been
widely used in recent feminist text as the main subject. This term has been
created to describe the oppressed, non-western woman who suffers so greatly,
and in such unjust culture and socioeconomic society. She uses information
published by other scholars about their own third world cultures to enrich her
own argument, so while the article of focusing specifically on western feminist
dialogues about the third world woman, the critiques she has offered also
pertain to those of the other scholars, whose analytical arguments are almost
identical. Throughout the article, she is trying to show how western feminist
writings, while trying to prove how all women face the same struggles, but the
“third world woman” who suffers so much more, should adopt these western
feminist ideals as their own. These women should adopt international links but
what the western feminists are trying to do is sell a product, their feminism
being the product.
In “Remaking Women: Feminism and Modernity in the Middle
East”, edited by Lila Abu-Lughod, she describes how those who claim to reject
feminist ideals as western imports actually practice a form of this type of
feminism. The Islamists are dependent on the ideas of early modernizing
reformers as these ideas have become transformed, widely spread and normalized
into people’s lives through the socioeconomic changes of the last century.
Throughout the article, she describes several “tv serial” writers and the
content of their shows. The author believes “tv serials” are not as influential
and powerful to modern feminism as the producers and critics of these shows believe.
But some writers who have been involved with television since the 60’s write
about several women’s issues. One of the television writers, who is female,
described how she struggled with censors because some of the content of her shows
was deemed unrealistic to how the women of Egypt actually acted in society.
Both these articles expressed how this idea of modern
feminism had distorted society in dramatic ways. In the first article, this “third
world woman” is being told how she should act, what battles to fight wherein
the second article when these modern ideas are adopted, they are dismissed and
fought against. In the second article, many women made traditionalism a new
form of feminism, adopting hijabs and leaving their jobs to be mothers and
housewives. These women were fought by "conservatives" but most of the time, the men preaching to the women were more conservative then the women themselves. Women are adopting new ideas, but hopefully, these ideas are their own and can helps create a more accepting world for them to live in.
The cited quote from the Mohanty article that clarifies her use of the term "colonization" is central to her argument. Mohanty claims that by methodologically treating "third world women" as a homogeneous, identifiable figure, Western scholarship participates in a form of cultural colonialism. This colonialism harvests individual women, refines their experiences into a recognizable, academic sign, and utilizes this constructed product to further produce knowledge about the original women. Mohanty argues that by ignoring localized cultures and histories in this way Western feminist scholarship lacks analytic value and fundamentally denies agency to actual women.
ReplyDelete