Cameron Collins
Response to Malek Alloula and Ann Laura Stoler Readings , Week 3:
Both articles this week concern themselves with colonial
discourses of race and gender. Ann Laura Stoler’s article on various modes of
sexual management in colonial societies demonstrates the politicization of
dominant, eugenic notions of native sexuality and gendered roles. Malek
Alloula’s reading draws heavily on photography from late colonial postcards to
visually represent the “Oriental” woman as a sign within various discourses also present in the Stoler article. Colonial understandings of natives as
particularly hyper-sexual deviants and generally inferior others are
central to both readings.
The Alloula reading hones in on
European conceptions native women’s sexuality. A series of postcard photographs
depict Algerian women simultaneously as prisoners and sexual objects. To
Europeans, the presence of barred windows and “Moorish” women would connote the
harem. As a sign, harems signify both the naturally imprisoned nature of
Algerian women and the essential sexuality and usability of their bodies. While
these postcards are meant for circulation between European tourist and their
relations rather than as documents for colonial policy, the comprehensible
meanings of the staged photograph exemplify the constructed knowledge about
Algerian women as well as a practical support for the discursive system
containing subaltern peoples.
Stoler provides a broader, more
historical and political context for this same discursive system. By charting
the progression from colonial promotion of concubine culture among European men
to the official outlaw of European-native sexual relations, Stoler highlights a
variety of discourses of power. Primary among those are power relations between
men-women and colonialist-subaltern. Stoler blends the two, reflecting on the political
utilization of women in maintaining colonial dominance. As European women were
encouraged to live in colonies, policies against cross-race sexual relations
became stricter. One apt example includes laws against sexual assault or
attempted sexual assault of European women by native men (this notably excludes
laws concerning rape by European men). The increasing prevalence of these laws
in the latter stages of colonialism reflect the understanding of the native as
an uncontrollable sexual deviant, the political utility of women in maintaining
colonial mores, and a great cultural concern with European racial superiority.
Those laws illustrate the intimate link between colonial and gendered power
relationships.
Cameron’s response did a great job of addressing the role of women that Stoler described.
ReplyDeleteOne particularly notable point from Stoler’s article for me was her description of the arrival of European women on page 19. The women were given special housing and amenities, to suit their “delicate sensibilities”. The housing was specifically “enclosed” and “insulated”, which to me read as an initial and easy separating of public and private spheres for women and men.
The further discussion of protecting European women from the threat of sexually deviant and aggressive native men can be viewed as another element in forcing women to subscribe to a private and domestic sphere, with the insinuation it is for their own safety.
-molly
Yes I similarly noticed how Stoler critically examines the various discourses of power within colonialism; most notably within the context of social classification and sexual control. I found Stoler’s brief discussion on the modernization of colonialism to be valuable because of the way she examines the constant and perpetual rethinking and regulation of new methods colonialists administered to display their dominance. One of the examples Stoler includes refers to the policies of eugenics which exemplified the unethical, discriminatory and strategical measures employed to secure European nationhood. The relationship between biopower and eugenics is inextricably linked due to the concern in controlling bodies and populations through different techniques such as forced sterilization and other invasive methods to ensure European racial superiority and nationhood.
ReplyDelete